You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Why do you use this "complex" notation ?
Even if it's not wrong and you are free to use your own value . It will be the same to write :
G92 E0
G1 E-3 F200
And in this case it's much more "easy" to read the Gcode and the -3mm retract. And most of all in this case the script should be Ok.
I created a new printer profile in Cura, and Cura provided that End g-code. It generally works so I have had no reason to revisit it.
Now that I'm looking through my various printer profiles in Cura, they all do it differently. It would seem that each printer profile has opinions on how to do this. The code above is generated as part of creating a "Malyan/Malyan M200 printer" or "Monoprice/Monoprice Select Mini V1" profile.
RetractTower g-code post-processing script configured for Distance results in large extrusion at end of print
Steps to reproduce:
These two lines, taken together, will result in the printer attempting to turn the extruder motor roughly 1325 steps at the end of the print.
I believe that this happens because my Cura Machine Settings End G-Code is configured as follows:
Note that the line "G1 E7 F200" has been rewritten.
When the RetractTower script is configured with Command: Speed, it rewrites the same line, but with far less disasterous results:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: