You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
PR #52 added support for default composition diagrams, in which variables sharing the same name are to be composed.
Currently, the names for the boxes in the returned RelationDiagram are explicitly given as a Vector{Symbol}.
However, we can make the user experience a little nicer by also providing a macro that uses the name of the Decapode object as the name to be used in the box.
So, we should support a macro that does such. Further, we could define a method for default_composition_diagram which just accepts a Vector of models, and uses default names Component1 etc. or Model1 etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
PR #52 added support for default composition diagrams, in which variables sharing the same name are to be composed.
Currently, the names for the boxes in the returned RelationDiagram are explicitly given as a
Vector{Symbol}
.However, we can make the user experience a little nicer by also providing a macro that uses the name of the Decapode object as the name to be used in the box.
So, we should support a macro that does such. Further, we could define a method for
default_composition_diagram
which just accepts a Vector of models, and uses default namesComponent1
etc. orModel1
etc.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: