Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make it easy to find application response logs for troubleshooting #361

Open
charris-msft opened this issue Feb 22, 2022 · 2 comments
Open
Labels
command extensions feature pm Requires PM spec or in-depth input before implementation templates
Milestone

Comments

@charris-msft
Copy link

Describe the bug
This is not a problem with Dev CLI - rather I want to bring awareness so Dev CLI can improve the current experience.

When deploying a basic Python app (Django or Flask) via Azure CLI or VS Code, it can be hard to track down application response logs that show 2xx and 4xx responses.

Expected behavior
When a new app is deployed, I expect the app template to have any required code, and any necessary logging to be enabled so I can quickly see 2xx and 4xx responses via CLI, VS Code or Portal.

Environment
Information on your environment:
* Python 3.8+
* VS Code (current version)

@savannahostrowski savannahostrowski added enhancement pm Requires PM spec or in-depth input before implementation labels Jul 19, 2022
@savannahostrowski
Copy link

Need to determine what the best course of action is here for improving this experience.

@savannahostrowski savannahostrowski transferred this issue from another repository Jul 28, 2022
@danieljurek danieljurek transferred this issue from another repository Aug 4, 2022
@rajeshkamal5050
Copy link
Contributor

rajeshkamal5050 commented Nov 8, 2024

@wbreza could it be a good use-case for an extension? #3565

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
command extensions feature pm Requires PM spec or in-depth input before implementation templates
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants