-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 172
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
performance regression in 2.5.x #112
Comments
@kokanin - we pulled SharpHound v2.5.4 from BloodHound v5.13.0 for these concerns. We're working on a fix and expect to have a new v2.5.X version available here shortly! |
https://github.com/BloodHoundAD/SharpHound/releases/tag/v2.5.6 We published v2.5.6, give it a try and see if it works for you |
2.5.6 hovers around 2.5-2.7 objects/second |
What collection methods are you using? We've tested this in several different environments now and have not seen performance like that anywhere |
At least the ACL collection slows things to a crawl: |
Would it be possible to run with |
I believe we identified the source of this slowdown and fixed it in https://github.com/BloodHoundAD/SharpHound/releases/tag/v2.5.7 |
ACL collection going at 500 obj/s using 2.5.7 so it seems you fixed that part, thanks! It is still floating around 30 obj/s when doing -c All but I can live with this. |
2.4.1 pulls 150 objects/second, 2.5.x pulls around 1.5, causing my patience to expire before collection finishes
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: