You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There are two related bugs in the current BR-61 test for CII:
The BR-61 in EN16931-model.sch is in the context "$Payment_instructions". This is wrong. It should be in the context "$CreditTransfer_information".
So, please change <rule context="$Payment_instructions "> <assert test="$BR-49" flag="fatal" id="BR-49">[BR-49]-A Payment instruction (BG-16) shall specify the Payment means type code (BT-81).</assert> <assert test="$BR-61" flag="fatal" id="BR-61">[BR-61]-If the Payment means type code (BT-81) means SEPA credit transfer, Local credit transfer or Non-SEPA international credit transfer, the Payment account identifier (BT-84) shall be present.</assert> </rule>
to
<rule context="$Payment_instructions "> <assert test="$BR-49" flag="fatal" id="BR-49">[BR-49]-A Payment instruction (BG-16) shall specify the Payment means type code (BT-81).</assert> </rule> <rule context="$CreditTransfer_information "> <assert test="$BR-61" flag="fatal" id="BR-61">[BR-61]-If the Payment means type code (BT-81) means SEPA credit transfer, Local credit transfer or Non-SEPA international credit transfer, the Payment account identifier (BT-84) shall be present.</assert> </rule>
"$CreditTransfer_information" is incorrect and currently not used. It states <param name="CreditTransfer_information " value="//ram:SpecifiedTradeSettlementPaymentMeans[ram:TypeCode='30' or ram:TypeCode='58']/ram:PayerPartyDebtorFinancialAccount"/>
but it should be <param name="CreditTransfer_information " value="//ram:SpecifiedTradeSettlementPaymentMeans[ram:TypeCode='30' or ram:TypeCode='58']/ram:PayeePartyCreditorFinancialAccount"/>
(PayeePartyCreditor... instead of PayerPartyDebtor...) Currently it is checking for BT-91 instead of BT-84.
Thanks a lot,
Andreas
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi everyone,
There are two related bugs in the current BR-61 test for CII:
So, please change
<rule context="$Payment_instructions ">
<assert test="$BR-49" flag="fatal" id="BR-49">[BR-49]-A Payment instruction (BG-16) shall specify the Payment means type code (BT-81).</assert>
<assert test="$BR-61" flag="fatal" id="BR-61">[BR-61]-If the Payment means type code (BT-81) means SEPA credit transfer, Local credit transfer or Non-SEPA international credit transfer, the Payment account identifier (BT-84) shall be present.</assert>
</rule>
to
<rule context="$Payment_instructions ">
<assert test="$BR-49" flag="fatal" id="BR-49">[BR-49]-A Payment instruction (BG-16) shall specify the Payment means type code (BT-81).</assert>
</rule>
<rule context="$CreditTransfer_information ">
<assert test="$BR-61" flag="fatal" id="BR-61">[BR-61]-If the Payment means type code (BT-81) means SEPA credit transfer, Local credit transfer or Non-SEPA international credit transfer, the Payment account identifier (BT-84) shall be present.</assert>
</rule>
<param name="CreditTransfer_information " value="//ram:SpecifiedTradeSettlementPaymentMeans[ram:TypeCode='30' or ram:TypeCode='58']/ram:PayerPartyDebtorFinancialAccount"/>
but it should be
<param name="CreditTransfer_information " value="//ram:SpecifiedTradeSettlementPaymentMeans[ram:TypeCode='30' or ram:TypeCode='58']/ram:PayeePartyCreditorFinancialAccount"/>
(PayeePartyCreditor... instead of PayerPartyDebtor...) Currently it is checking for BT-91 instead of BT-84.
Thanks a lot,
Andreas
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: