-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
use Content Length hint to pre-allocate buffer when reading body from sysprobe #30689
use Content Length hint to pre-allocate buffer when reading body from sysprobe #30689
Conversation
Test changes on VMUse this command from test-infra-definitions to manually test this PR changes on a VM: inv create-vm --pipeline-id=48102422 --os-family=ubuntu Note: This applies to commit a1c4c93 |
Regression DetectorRegression Detector ResultsRun ID: 72914266-4759-4b4d-b013-b5b08dd7a1e9 Metrics dashboard Target profiles Baseline: b302cea Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:
No significant changes in experiment optimization goalsConfidence level: 90.00% There were no significant changes in experiment optimization goals at this confidence level and effect size tolerance.
|
perf | experiment | goal | Δ mean % | Δ mean % CI | trials | links |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu | % cpu utilization | +1.70 | [+0.97, +2.44] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | pycheck_lots_of_tags | % cpu utilization | +1.32 | [-1.14, +3.79] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | idle_all_features | memory utilization | +0.90 | [+0.80, +1.00] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | tcp_syslog_to_blackhole | ingress throughput | +0.45 | [+0.40, +0.50] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_tree | memory utilization | +0.28 | [+0.15, +0.41] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory utilization | +0.23 | [+0.13, +0.33] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | egress throughput | +0.03 | [-0.15, +0.21] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | idle | memory utilization | +0.01 | [-0.04, +0.05] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude | ingress throughput | +0.00 | [-0.01, +0.01] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.23, +0.22] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | uds_dogstatsd_to_api | ingress throughput | -0.00 | [-0.11, +0.10] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.01 | [-0.34, +0.32] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | otel_to_otel_logs | ingress throughput | -0.24 | [-1.04, +0.57] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.25 | [-0.74, +0.24] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | egress throughput | -0.34 | [-0.59, -0.10] | 1 | Logs |
➖ | quality_gate_idle | memory utilization | -0.40 | [-0.45, -0.35] | 1 | Logs bounds checks dashboard |
➖ | basic_py_check | % cpu utilization | -0.57 | [-3.21, +2.06] | 1 | Logs |
Bounds Checks
perf | experiment | bounds_check_name | replicates_passed |
---|---|---|---|
✅ | file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 |
✅ | file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency | memory_usage | 10/10 |
✅ | idle | memory_usage | 10/10 |
✅ | idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 |
✅ | quality_gate_idle | memory_usage | 10/10 |
✅ | quality_gate_idle_all_features | memory_usage | 10/10 |
Explanation
A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".
For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:
-
Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.
-
Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.
-
Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".
/merge |
🚂 MergeQueue: pull request added to the queue The median merge time in Use |
What does this PR do?
Now that the core process code is running in the core agent, most of the process agent work is spent fetching connections from the system-probe and this is reflected in the amount of allocations done by the process agent. Example profile.
This PR improves the situation a bit by taking advantage of the Content Length header of system probe responses to pre-allocate the response buffer.
Motivation
Describe how to test/QA your changes
Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs
Additional Notes