Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bump github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5 from 5.0.137 to 5.0.138 #31678

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

dependabot[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@dependabot dependabot bot commented on behalf of github Dec 2, 2024

Bumps github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5 from 5.0.137 to 5.0.138.

Release notes

Sourced from github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5's releases.

v5.0.138

What's Changed

New Contributors

Full Changelog: DataDog/agent-payload@v5.0.137...v5.0.138

Commits
  • 9c811a1 Merge pull request #355 from DataDog/aurele.oules/add-tags-to-manifest
  • e8f5da6 Add tags to manifest
  • 756b62f Merge pull request #357 from DataDog/robertjli/PROCS-4380-cont-codeowners
  • e13bfb0 [CODEOWNERS] Update processes to container-intake
  • 1a267ea Merge pull request #356 from DataDog/momar/add-protocol-to-bindNode
  • See full diff in compare view

Dependabot compatibility score

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.


Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

  • @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
  • @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
  • @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
  • @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
  • @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
  • @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
  • @dependabot show <dependency name> ignore conditions will show all of the ignore conditions of the specified dependency
  • @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
  • @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

Bumps [github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5](https://github.com/DataDog/agent-payload) from 5.0.137 to 5.0.138.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/releases)
- [Commits](DataDog/agent-payload@v5.0.137...v5.0.138)

---
updated-dependencies:
- dependency-name: github.com/DataDog/agent-payload/v5
  dependency-type: direct:production
  update-type: version-update:semver-patch
...

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]>
@dependabot dependabot bot added changelog/no-changelog dependencies PRs that bump a dependency dependencies-go PRs that bump a go dependency team/triage labels Dec 2, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly label Dec 2, 2024
Copy link

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: 2ac5d257-d3e3-4250-a398-2d262e83c511

Baseline: be4b703
Comparison: cf5d1c3
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
quality_gate_idle memory utilization +0.27 [+0.22, +0.33] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput +0.23 [-0.40, +0.87] 1 Logs
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization +0.23 [-2.76, +3.22] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization +0.05 [-0.10, +0.19] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput +0.03 [-0.71, +0.77] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput +0.02 [-0.75, +0.79] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput +0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput -0.02 [-0.11, +0.08] 1 Logs
pycheck_lots_of_tags % cpu utilization -0.02 [-3.58, +3.54] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput -0.02 [-0.48, +0.44] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput -0.05 [-0.82, +0.73] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput -0.11 [-0.89, +0.66] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization -0.29 [-1.01, +0.43] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput -0.30 [-0.39, -0.21] 1 Logs
basic_py_check % cpu utilization -0.31 [-4.12, +3.51] 1 Logs
otel_to_otel_logs ingress throughput -0.78 [-1.44, -0.12] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -0.91 [-1.03, -0.78] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard

Bounds Checks: ❌ Failed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 7/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 9/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog dependencies PRs that bump a dependency dependencies-go PRs that bump a go dependency short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly team/triage
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants