Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AMLII-2210 enable Java FIPS provider on Windows FIPS images #32026

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Dec 12, 2024

Conversation

vickenty
Copy link
Contributor

What does this PR do?

Enable Java FIPS provider on Windows FIPS images.

Motivation

Describe how you validated your changes

Configure ActiveMQ with JMX mutual TLS encryption. Check that the key store for JMXFetch is in BCFKS format.

Run Datadog Agent JMX FIPS image. JMXFetch should be able to connect to both the Agent and JMX endpoint and collect metrics.

Possible Drawbacks / Trade-offs

Additional Notes

@vickenty vickenty added changelog/no-changelog qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests labels Dec 11, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly label Dec 11, 2024
@vickenty vickenty marked this pull request as ready for review December 11, 2024 14:54
@vickenty vickenty requested review from a team as code owners December 11, 2024 14:54
@@ -23,6 +24,7 @@ RUN . ./install.ps1
COPY bouncycastle-fips /fips-build
COPY install-fips.ps1 ./
RUN . ./install-fips.ps1
ENV JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS="${WITH_JMX_FIPS:+--module-path=\'c:\\program files\\datadog\\bouncycastle fips\' -Djava.security.properties==\'c:\\program files\\datadog\\bouncycastle fips\\java.security\' -Dpolicy.url.2=\'file:c:\\program files\\datadog\\bouncycastle fips\\bc-fips.policy\'}"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

could we use the WITH_FIPS arg instead of making another one?

@github-actions github-actions bot added medium review PR review might take time and removed short review PR is simple enough to be reviewed quickly labels Dec 11, 2024
@vickenty
Copy link
Contributor Author

/merge

@dd-devflow
Copy link

dd-devflow bot commented Dec 12, 2024

Devflow running: /merge

View all feedbacks in Devflow UI.


2024-12-12 12:51:37 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: waiting for PR to be ready

This merge request is not mergeable yet, because of pending checks/missing approvals. It will be added to the queue as soon as checks pass and/or get approvals.
Note: if you pushed new commits since the last approval, you may need additional approval.
You can remove it from the waiting list with /remove command.


2024-12-12 13:46:35 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: merge request added to the queue

The median merge time in main is 27m.


2024-12-12 14:07:48 UTC ℹ️ MergeQueue: This merge request was merged

@agent-platform-auto-pr
Copy link
Contributor

[Fast Unit Tests Report]

On pipeline 50944395 (CI Visibility). The following jobs did not run any unit tests:

Jobs:
  • tests_deb-arm64-py3
  • tests_deb-x64-py3
  • tests_flavor_dogstatsd_deb-x64
  • tests_flavor_heroku_deb-x64
  • tests_flavor_iot_deb-x64
  • tests_rpm-arm64-py3
  • tests_rpm-x64-py3
  • tests_windows-x64

If you modified Go files and expected unit tests to run in these jobs, please double check the job logs. If you think tests should have been executed reach out to #agent-devx-help

Copy link

Regression Detector

Regression Detector Results

Metrics dashboard
Target profiles
Run ID: efc71982-9160-4267-9565-6841db55144a

Baseline: 94679d8
Comparison: b888bd6
Diff

Optimization Goals: ✅ No significant changes detected

Fine details of change detection per experiment

perf experiment goal Δ mean % Δ mean % CI trials links
otel_to_otel_logs ingress throughput +1.20 [+0.55, +1.86] 1 Logs
tcp_syslog_to_blackhole ingress throughput +0.91 [+0.85, +0.98] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load egress throughput +0.34 [-0.12, +0.80] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency egress throughput +0.32 [-0.45, +1.10] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle memory utilization +0.18 [+0.14, +0.23] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency egress throughput +0.01 [-0.83, +0.84] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 egress throughput +0.00 [-0.82, +0.83] 1 Logs
tcp_dd_logs_filter_exclude ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.01, +0.01] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api ingress throughput -0.00 [-0.11, +0.11] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency egress throughput -0.03 [-0.79, +0.74] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency egress throughput -0.03 [-0.80, +0.74] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency egress throughput -0.04 [-0.67, +0.59] 1 Logs
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 egress throughput -0.04 [-0.89, +0.80] 1 Logs
file_tree memory utilization -0.05 [-0.17, +0.07] 1 Logs
uds_dogstatsd_to_api_cpu % cpu utilization -0.51 [-1.24, +0.22] 1 Logs
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory utilization -1.56 [-1.68, -1.45] 1 Logs bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs % cpu utilization -2.29 [-5.21, +0.64] 1 Logs

Bounds Checks: ✅ Passed

perf experiment bounds_check_name replicates_passed links
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http1 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_0ms_latency_http2 memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_1000ms_latency_linear_load memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_100ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_300ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency lost_bytes 10/10
file_to_blackhole_500ms_latency memory_usage 10/10
quality_gate_idle memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_idle_all_features memory_usage 10/10 bounds checks dashboard
quality_gate_logs lost_bytes 10/10
quality_gate_logs memory_usage 10/10

Explanation

Confidence level: 90.00%
Effect size tolerance: |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%

Performance changes are noted in the perf column of each table:

  • ✅ = significantly better comparison variant performance
  • ❌ = significantly worse comparison variant performance
  • ➖ = no significant change in performance

A regression test is an A/B test of target performance in a repeatable rig, where "performance" is measured as "comparison variant minus baseline variant" for an optimization goal (e.g., ingress throughput). Due to intrinsic variability in measuring that goal, we can only estimate its mean value for each experiment; we report uncertainty in that value as a 90.00% confidence interval denoted "Δ mean % CI".

For each experiment, we decide whether a change in performance is a "regression" -- a change worth investigating further -- if all of the following criteria are true:

  1. Its estimated |Δ mean %| ≥ 5.00%, indicating the change is big enough to merit a closer look.

  2. Its 90.00% confidence interval "Δ mean % CI" does not contain zero, indicating that if our statistical model is accurate, there is at least a 90.00% chance there is a difference in performance between baseline and comparison variants.

  3. Its configuration does not mark it "erratic".

CI Pass/Fail Decision

Passed. All Quality Gates passed.

  • quality_gate_idle_all_features, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_idle, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check lost_bytes: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.
  • quality_gate_logs, bounds check memory_usage: 10/10 replicas passed. Gate passed.

@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot merged commit 185ffe3 into main Dec 12, 2024
212 checks passed
@dd-mergequeue dd-mergequeue bot deleted the vickenty/bcf-jto-win branch December 12, 2024 14:07
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 7.62.0 milestone Dec 12, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
changelog/no-changelog medium review PR review might take time qa/done QA done before merge and regressions are covered by tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants