Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Harmonize MEI DataTypes in converter, customization & validation #63

Open
anneferger opened this issue Nov 23, 2022 · 5 comments
Open
Assignees

Comments

@anneferger
Copy link
Member

anneferger commented Nov 23, 2022

Remove differences between the ids and descriptions, use for all:

id description git hash link for reference (relative to https://github.com/music-encoding/schema/)
meidev MEI dev dev/mei-all.rng
mei401 MEI 4.0.1 0d6486c 4.0.1/mei-all.rng
mei401-any MEI 4.0.1 All anyStart 0d6486c
mei401-cmn MEI 4.0.1 CMN 0d6486c
mei401-mensural MEI 4.0.1 Mensural 0d6486c
mei401-neumes MEI 4.0.1 Neumes 0d6486c
mei400 MEI 4.0.0 0d6486c
mei300 MEI 3.0.0 0d6486c
mei211 MEI 2.1.1 0d6486c
mei200 MEI 2.0.0
mei100 MEI 1.0.0
customization id in customization customization id in converter and validator with version example
c-mei-all mei401
c-mei-all-any mei401-any
c-mei-cmn mei401-cmn
c-mei-mensural mei401-mensural
c-mei-neumes mei401-neumes
c-mei-local -
- mei401-basic

Customization have a different setup/data type
Locations to harmonize:

@anneferger anneferger self-assigned this Nov 23, 2022
@anneferger
Copy link
Member Author

This also refers to the Validation in the Webclient because it determines the paths in the GUI

@anneferger
Copy link
Member Author

@anneferger
Copy link
Member Author

see https://github.com/music-encoding/schema for the naming

anneferger added a commit to Edirom/mei-validator that referenced this issue Mar 29, 2023
@anneferger
Copy link
Member Author

This is also relevant for all input data types, difference vs. id and name, parsing in GUI of id and version number must be possible. Mimetypes in URLs of API calls may be removed there for shorter urls because mapping exists?

@anneferger
Copy link
Member Author

anneferger commented Oct 23, 2023

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant