Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Locational Information for a Manifest #154

Closed
thehabes opened this issue Apr 24, 2020 · 2 comments · Fixed by #160
Closed

Locational Information for a Manifest #154

thehabes opened this issue Apr 24, 2020 · 2 comments · Fixed by #160
Assignees

Comments

@thehabes
Copy link
Contributor

thehabes commented Apr 24, 2020

navPlace Extension

PR : #160

Use case

You have a IIIF Manifest the represents a real early history manuscript. It resides at [lat, lon]. You would like the coordinates to render in a web map. You want a point to be drawn that represents the coordinates and you want some extra data to be attached to that point, such as a label.

Further Information

This is originating from the IIIF + Maps conference, the original issue can be found at IIIF/iiif-stories#118.

The recipe is a stepping stone to recipes for the following stories

Recipes for those stories should note this recipe and, where possible, will be collapsed into this recipe.

@thehabes thehabes self-assigned this Apr 24, 2020
@thehabes thehabes changed the title Geocoding With Extension Geolocating With Extension Jun 2, 2020
@thehabes thehabes changed the title Geolocating With Extension Geolocating Using An Extension Jun 26, 2020
@thehabes thehabes changed the title Geolocating Using An Extension Locational Information with navPlace Feb 12, 2021
@thehabes
Copy link
Contributor Author

Catching this up with IIIF Maps TSG developments and the recent IIIF Cookbook map related recipe.

@thehabes
Copy link
Contributor Author

We can do #182 and #195 with this extension.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants