Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for structured metadata #161

Open
Nopik opened this issue May 11, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Add support for structured metadata #161

Nopik opened this issue May 11, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@Nopik
Copy link

Nopik commented May 11, 2024

In order to improve performance of Loki, it should be possible to use structured metadata: https://grafana.com/docs/loki/latest/get-started/labels/structured-metadata/

Copy link
Contributor

sweep-ai bot commented May 22, 2024

Sweeping

0%

Actions

  • ↻ Restart Sweep

❌ Unable to Complete PR

The issue was rejected with the following response:

Thank you for the feature request to add support for structured metadata in Loki. In order for our AI engineer Sweep to implement this, we would need some additional details:

  • Guidance on which specific Loki components and code paths need to be updated to support structured metadata
  • Code examples of what you expect the structured metadata functionality to look like
  • Performance benchmarks or goals to aim for to validate the feature is improving performance as expected
  • Detailed acceptance criteria that can be tested to consider the feature complete

If you're able to provide more of these implementation specifics, Sweep should be able to take this on and add the structured metadata support to Loki. Let me know if you have any other questions!

For bonus Sweep issues, please report this bug on our community forum (tracking ID: 735e72b587).


Tip

To recreate the pull request, edit the issue title or description.

This is an automated message generated by Sweep AI.

@JaniAnttonen
Copy link
Owner

JaniAnttonen commented May 22, 2024

Was worth a try, lel. Will look into this soon myself, thanks for the issue! :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants