-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hooks for Juno/VSCode integration #2
Comments
Also easy triggering of the breakpoints would be great. To be honest, I think that Infiltrator style (i.e. fullspeed debugging with less ability to modify as it executes) is the more frequent use case for debugging for GUI users. |
As for the integration, I found this: [1] f(::Int64) at none:7
[2] top-level scope at none:0
[3] eval at boot.jl:330 [inlined]
[4] repleval(::Module, ::Expr) at repl.jl:141
[5] (::getfield(Atom, Symbol("##174#176")){Module})() at repl.jl:163
[6] with_logstate(::getfield(Atom, Symbol("##174#176")){Module}, ::Base.CoreLogging.LogState) at logging.jl:395
[7] with_logger at logging.jl:491 [inlined]
[8] evalrepl(::Module, ::String) at repl.jl:154 This is because this line is not handled by this part. |
Absolutely, this thing is fast! Not put off by the inability to step, I can just place multiple |
Is this related to julia-vscode/julia-vscode#963? It would be amazing if we could use Infiltrator in the VSCode debugger UI, if even to just set and disable the breakpoints. |
Loosely, yes. I think I'd much prefer Frames' idea of basically integrating MixedModeDebugger 2.0 instead of Infiltrator. |
Needed for stacktrace and local variables.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: