-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Road to 1.0 #361
Comments
Actually, I have forgotten how far I have worked 😅, but somethings should have already been achieved. However, there are few breaking changes other than the bug fixes. In regards to the white point |
You have done wonders for these packages. "Cleanups" can be done after 1.0 if they don't break the public API. If we grossly change the result of a white-point aware conversion, though, that is certainly breaking. |
CC @cormullion
It may be useful for the testing to add "julia_blue", "julia_green", "julia_purple" and "julia_red" to the named colors. I also feel that "nationalism" is too much, though. 😄 |
No problem. What do you mean by "I also feel that "nationalism" is too much, though."? |
Adding "julia_blue" etc. to the named colors is not necessarily a public interest. |
Ah, I see. :) Anyway, probably not many people use them (apart from me, I expect)... |
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
If there breaking changes in master currently ? I wanted to use some of the XYZ to RGB conversion but last release was before it was added (27 Apr 2021). Would it be possible to make a minor release before 1.0 ? |
Yeah, we need to do something about this. I am pretty swamped with TTFX work until at least mid-October, unfortunately. If you'd be willing to figure out what to do perhaps we could review your work and then make a release. |
I had a look at the merged PRs and there's a couple labelled as breaking since last release :
Otherwise it's mostly performance & accuracy improvements, with a few new features ( |
Can we transition this package to 1.0 already? The problem with 0.xx releases is that they provide strictly less information than 1.x.y release — semver assumes that every 0.xx release is breaking.' Version numbers are cheap. 30+ packages depend on this package. It's been out for ages, and the API hasn't changed much for a while. |
I'd like to move the whole JuliaImages stack to version numbers >= 1.0 (see JuliaImages/Images.jl#825). Let's use this issue to collect plans for breaking changes in the near future.
Issues/PRs on my agenda:
MSC()
is strange #349, but I worry that will take a while and hence might be 2.0 materialThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: