We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
The masking ratio is randomly sampled from [0.7, 1]. Did you conduct an ablation study on the effect of different ranges for the masking ratio?
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Similar to MAE we sweep the masking ratio and find 0.7 is the best. For different tasks/data, the optimal masking ratio is typically different.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
The masking ratio is randomly sampled from [0.7, 1]. Did you conduct an ablation study on the effect of different ranges for the masking ratio?
Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: