You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Motion correction is systematically applied to input scan, even if one uses an already pre-processed image (e.g. generated from fMRIprep, which applies motion correction already)
What is the motivation / use case for changing the behaviour?
It is redundant to do motion correction twice in this case, but there is no way to skip this step in micapipe if running the pipeline through a container for example. Could the motion correction step be controlled via a yes/no flag? pretty please and many thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Motion correction is systematically applied to input scan, even if one uses an already pre-processed image (e.g. generated from fMRIprep, which applies motion correction already)
It is redundant to do motion correction twice in this case, but there is no way to skip this step in micapipe if running the pipeline through a container for example. Could the motion correction step be controlled via a yes/no flag? pretty please and many thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: