Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[fs][feature] “in memory” vs “real” file system #168

Open
auguwu opened this issue Nov 10, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

[fs][feature] “in memory” vs “real” file system #168

auguwu opened this issue Nov 10, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested

Comments

@auguwu
Copy link
Member

auguwu commented Nov 10, 2024

The title is somewhat self explanatory: there should be a “in memory” implementation of remi-fs but it’ll probably require the StorageService trait to be mutable (which would be a breaking change) or have a thread/static variable to keep track of changes. Though, the in memory filesystem would most likely be for testing or evaluation purposes.

@auguwu auguwu added documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested labels Nov 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants