Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Naming convention for ports needs to be improved #9

Closed
dietmarw opened this issue Nov 20, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

Naming convention for ports needs to be improved #9

dietmarw opened this issue Nov 20, 2019 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@dietmarw
Copy link
Collaborator

The documentation and parameters always refer to inlet and outlet but also to D_1 and D_2. In addition the connectors are named p and n which adds even more confusion.
The naming should be cleaned up and should use index i and o instead, throughout the library.

@dietmarw dietmarw added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 20, 2019
@dietmarw dietmarw self-assigned this Nov 20, 2019
@dietmarw dietmarw added this to the v2.0.0 milestone Nov 20, 2019
dietmarw added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 20, 2019
None of the experimental test models in `Tests` will work since they were not updated. Not much point in wasting time to do that now. Rather look at those models and fix them when needed.
@dietmarw
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Fixed in b08e3fa and bc6919f

@dietmarw
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Documentation still needs to be updated. I.e., the images.

@dietmarw
Copy link
Collaborator Author

dietmarw commented Sep 7, 2022

The User's Guide update has been postponed to a later release. See #39

@dietmarw dietmarw closed this as completed Sep 7, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant