E2E Testing the Greenwood website (with GitHub Actions) #560
Replies: 3 comments 3 replies
-
|
Probably want to add this to the test suite - #909 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
another case to cover - #932 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
More router bugs |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Not our bug for once, but this also happened lately - #1068 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Started up a little proof of concept using Playwright, for anyone interested in working on this. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
|
Website has moved to another repo, so closing this one out |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Coming out of #500 / #515 (and #495), and as with most apps, it is clear that certain features of Greenwood would benefit from being tested in a browser and just what can be determined from reading the generated HTML. Actually clicking links and confirming routing works, would be much better suited to being executed by a real browser.
It would be great to get this run as a GitHub Action, either as part of CI or at the least when merged into master. Not sure what good testing tools we could use, maybe Cypress or Web Test Runner?
Doesn't need to be much, but would be nice to have some basic peace of mind.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions