You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently the scripts check for the presence of an ARM core to determine if a board is a Zynq or not when the client disconnects, in order to determine which reset logic to use.
If the Zynq somehow gets into a bad state this check can fail, as well as the ability to run code on the ARM from SDK, needing a board power cycle.
It should be possible to annotate boards as Zynq (or other types) in the board configuration file, then use this same check when a container is started to find the error during client connection and handle this (e.g. pushing client onto a different board, blacklisting the board, notifying someone of the issue).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Currently the scripts check for the presence of an ARM core to determine if a board is a Zynq or not when the client disconnects, in order to determine which reset logic to use.
If the Zynq somehow gets into a bad state this check can fail, as well as the ability to run code on the ARM from SDK, needing a board power cycle.
It should be possible to annotate boards as Zynq (or other types) in the board configuration file, then use this same check when a container is started to find the error during client connection and handle this (e.g. pushing client onto a different board, blacklisting the board, notifying someone of the issue).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: