We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
There is an inconsistency in the quadprog wrapper when unwrapping dual multipliers:
proxqp_benchmark/solvers/quadprog.py
Lines 86 to 89 in 240c3f3
That is, y_sol[eq_ids] is taken as -y when there is no inequality but +y when there are some.
y_sol[eq_ids]
-y
+y
I think +y is the correct conversion in this context, but to be checked.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
There is an inconsistency in the quadprog wrapper when unwrapping dual multipliers:
proxqp_benchmark/solvers/quadprog.py
Lines 86 to 89 in 240c3f3
That is,
y_sol[eq_ids]
is taken as-y
when there is no inequality but+y
when there are some.I think
+y
is the correct conversion in this context, but to be checked.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: