You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am testing the time cost for proxqp, and I wonder if the time could be less using T = float compared to T = double.
However, using the same setting will make the qp unstable and unsolved.
I guess the default setting params in proxqp/setting.hpp is tuned for double.
Is there any suggestion for tuning and the most important params for time cost?
I am testing the time cost for proxqp, and I wonder if the time could be less using T = float compared to T = double.
However, using the same setting will make the qp unstable and unsolved.
I guess the default setting params in
proxqp/setting.hpp
is tuned for double.Is there any suggestion for tuning and the most important params for time cost?
btw, I have adjusted the eps_abs and eps_rel
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: