Replies: 3 comments 1 reply
-
Hi @Tissot11 I moved this to the discussions as I don't think this is a bug. I believe your result is related to the fact that the definition you are using in your Pxx diagnostic (
Note of course that |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Thanks. Since the default categories are either Bug or Feature Request for submitting a new issue, I choose Bug. Both electrons and ions have the same non-relativistic drifts (mean velocities) in x direction, so it is a bit perplexing that electrons diagnostic gives correct results while ion diagnostics does not. Is it because, the ion momentum is scaled in terms of electrons mass scale, making it relativistic in terms of electron momentum? Of course, I can create separate diagnostics and do the stuff in post-processing. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Do you think, this would work?
and subtract this |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I have found inconsistency while calculating
Pxx
for calculating the temperatures using the Particle Binning diagnostics. I have initialised electrons and ions using the same temperature and density profiles. While I get the correct results for electrons(Txx, Tyy, Tzz)
but for ions, I get incorrect results only forPxx or Txx
.Tyy
andTzz
for ions are correct too. I have already adjusted for ion mass factor. Both the values and the profile (x<0
) forTxx
component of ions is incorrect at the initialisation.Txx
is supposed to have the same profile like for other components and other species.I am a bit perplexed by this inconsistency. How to understand this? I do have a drift in x-direction for both electron and ions. Below are the snippets for electrons and ions diagnostics
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions