You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I’m seeking advice on the best compiler to use for building aom-psy101, specifically to maximize performance.
So far, I’ve tried the following:
MSVC
GCC and Clang via MSYS2
Clang and Clang-CL via Ninja
Clang-CL using the -T ClangCL flag
From my initial testing, I found that MSVC and GCC (MSYS2) are slower than any of the Clang variants. However, the performance of Clang (MSYS2), Clang and Clang-CL (Ninja), and Clang-CL (-T ClangCL) appears to be roughly equal. That said, my testing has been brief, and more thorough comparisons are needed to determine which is truly the fastest.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I’m seeking advice on the best compiler to use for building aom-psy101, specifically to maximize performance.
So far, I’ve tried the following:
-T ClangCL
flagFrom my initial testing, I found that MSVC and GCC (MSYS2) are slower than any of the Clang variants. However, the performance of Clang (MSYS2), Clang and Clang-CL (Ninja), and Clang-CL (
-T ClangCL
) appears to be roughly equal. That said, my testing has been brief, and more thorough comparisons are needed to determine which is truly the fastest.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: