Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allowing different multiprocessing engines #37

Open
orellabac opened this issue Feb 1, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Allowing different multiprocessing engines #37

orellabac opened this issue Feb 1, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@orellabac
Copy link

**Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe
I hace environments were I cannot use this library because i cannot leverage multiprocessing only threading.

Describe the solution you'd like
Using a backed that allow multiple backends will be great

Describe alternatives you've considered
Joblib

@sfc-gh-mrojas
Copy link

Hi @Wittline do you think it will possible to consider this change ?

@Wittline
Copy link
Owner

Hi @sfc-gh-mrojas could you please provide more technical details? I did not see your requests before, I am not receiving notifications about new issues.

@sfc-gh-mrojas
Copy link

Sure. Currently the code depends on the multiprocessing lib. The problem is that in some environments I cannot spawn new processes. I think there is PR using job lib that way the backend is configurable and it allows several scenarios. We would like to allow that.
What are your thoughts?

@Wittline
Copy link
Owner

Hi @sfc-gh-mrojas @orellabac, have you had a chance to test the performance of the code? If so, could you please share some details about the performance with different sizes of CSV files?

I would be interested in knowing the processing time and memory consumption for files of varying sizes. It would also be helpful to understand if there were any particular bottlenecks or challenges that you encountered during your testing.

Any additional insights you can provide on the performance of the code would be greatly appreciated. Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants