You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Motivation: It's a good baseline that should be easy to implement in the catwalk context, but nobody has asked for it.
Described by Liu at al like this:
Min et al. [21] proposed ensemble ICL, where instead of using the output probability from concatenating the k training examples, the output probabilities of the model on each training example (i.e. 1-shot ICL for each of the k examples) are multiplied together. This lowers the memory cost by a factor of k/2 but increases the computational cost by a factor of 2. In terms of task performance, Min et al. [21] find that ensemble ICL outperforms the standard concatenative variant.
This depends on first getting normal few-shot ICL working on Catwalk.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Motivation: It's a good baseline that should be easy to implement in the catwalk context, but nobody has asked for it.
Described by Liu at al like this:
Min et al. [21] proposed ensemble ICL, where instead of using the output probability from concatenating the k training examples, the output probabilities of the model on each training example (i.e. 1-shot ICL for each of the k examples) are multiplied together. This lowers the memory cost by a factor of k/2 but increases the computational cost by a factor of 2. In terms of task performance, Min et al. [21] find that ensemble ICL outperforms the standard concatenative variant.
This depends on first getting normal few-shot ICL working on Catwalk.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: