Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

brokit-wrapped applications that are not currently installed in the QIIME VM #20

Open
gregcaporaso opened this issue Apr 21, 2014 · 7 comments

Comments

@gregcaporaso
Copy link
Contributor

related to #19 (see comment from @josenavas)

  • usearch (but we can't install that)
  • clustalw (1.83, which is what cogent wraps, is available from here)
  • mafft (see qiime-deploy-conf's #36) - I can't find the wrapped version (6.602), and a slightly later version (6.815b, installed from .deb) fails the brokit unit tests; it turns out that I do have the PyCogent-wrapped version installed on compy though.
  • FastTree v1 (do we need this?) available here
@antgonza
Copy link
Contributor

We can add the last 3 to the qiime deploy, do you have the links?

BTW Which version of FastTree are we installing right now? How do we intend
to call v1 and current version (FastTree and FastTreev1)?

@josenavas
Copy link
Member

I think the current app controller expects for FastTree, so we probably will need to modify it so it is waiting for FastTreev1.

@gregcaporaso
Copy link
Contributor Author

I can't get FastTree v1 tests to pass with any of several versions of FastTree v1.x.x. I tried v1.0.0, v1.0.5 (the last of the v1.0.x series) and v 1.9.0 (the last of the v1.x.x series)...

@wasade
Copy link
Member

wasade commented Apr 21, 2014

Can we just drop v1?
On Apr 21, 2014 12:07 PM, "Greg Caporaso" [email protected] wrote:

I can't get FastTree v1 tests to pass with any of several versions of
FastTree v1.x.x. I tried v1.0.0, v1.0.5 (the last of the v1.0.x series) and
v 1.9.0 (the last of the v1.x.x series)...

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/20#issuecomment-40959139
.

@antgonza
Copy link
Contributor

Should we remove?

@rob-knight
Copy link

yes

On Apr 21, 2014, at 12:12 PM, Antonio Gonzalez <[email protected]mailto:[email protected]> wrote:

Should we remove?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/20#issuecomment-40959595.

@gregcaporaso
Copy link
Contributor Author

+1

This is now QIIME's #1516, and also discussed in #19.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants