Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposed JSON Support in Box CLI for Simplified Task Configuration #498

Open
Mki-developer opened this issue Sep 20, 2023 · 3 comments
Open
Assignees
Labels
enhancement needs-triage Added to new issues to mark that they require taking action

Comments

@Mki-developer
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.

We are using the Box CLI as part of our CI/CD pipeline and have encountered a critical limitation that is affecting our workflow:
Core Issue:
・The Box CLI can only handle one profile at a time on a single machine, and CLI environments can only be configured on a per-machine login user basis.
This core issue leads to a specific problem:
・Inability to Run Concurrent Jobs: Due to this limitation, it's currently unfeasible to run two Box access jobs at the same time while managing their respective environments (from adding to deleting).

Describe the solution you'd like

・Simplify Task Setup: To address this challenge, we would greatly benefit from the ability to specify configurations using a JSON file as an argument, similar to what we can do with the Python SDK.
The limitation significantly complicates our CI/CD processes. We would greatly appreciate it if this issue and the corresponding improvement could be addressed in future updates.

Describe alternatives you've considered

Additional context

@arjankowski arjankowski added the needs-triage Added to new issues to mark that they require taking action label Sep 20, 2023
@arjankowski
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @Mki-developer ,
Thank you for this issue, we created internal ticket to address your request (SDK-3342).
We will discuss it with the team and possibly plan it in our work schedule.

Regards,
Artur

@Mki-developer
Copy link
Author

Thank you for agreeing to respond to the request.
About a month has passed since our last communication, have you decided when you will be able to handle it?

Best regards,

@arjankowski
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @Mki-developer,

We've added it to our backlog, but we don't have it scheduled in our planned roadmap, which means we won't be able to implement it in the near future.
We will inform you as soon as this changes.

Best,

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement needs-triage Added to new issues to mark that they require taking action
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

7 participants