You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Instead of letting the Naive Bayes classifier generate a score by multiplying the conditional probabilities together, I read somewhere (I can't remember at the moment) that they count the number of features (words) that are highly confident for a particular class. For example:
8 highly positive features minus3 highly negative features, the result is +3, so the label is positive.
If the value is within some range around 0, then it could be labeled as neutral. Could also consider moderately confident values (or even low confidence), but in any case would need to determine the thresholds for pigeonholing the conditional probabilities into confidence levels.
Idea was originally recorded 3/12/13 at 23:01.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Instead of letting the Naive Bayes classifier generate a score by multiplying the conditional probabilities together, I read somewhere (I can't remember at the moment) that they count the number of features (words) that are highly confident for a particular class. For example:
8
highly positive features minus3
highly negative features, the result is+3
, so the label is positive.If the value is within some range around
0
, then it could be labeled as neutral. Could also consider moderately confident values (or even low confidence), but in any case would need to determine the thresholds for pigeonholing the conditional probabilities into confidence levels.Idea was originally recorded 3/12/13 at 23:01.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: