You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When a PR/issue has no reviewers specified in the description, the hook should just update the status, not the assignees. request review from the configured default.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think that the important functionality here is that when no "reviewers" marker is found the robot should fallback to a repo or organization default list of reviewers.
Yes, you can't assign to a team, so you not try.
But what you can do, is that instead of assigning the PR to a person, you should request a review from a person or a team.
The current "assignment" behaviour is from the old times when there was no concept of "reviewer" for a PR.
At the beginning of GitHub, I think that even inline comments were missing.
You only had the general comment.
When a PR/issue has no reviewers specified in the description, the hook should
just update the status, not the assignees.request review from the configured default.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: