Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug-Candidate]: Possible differences in addresses #42

Open
glarregay-tob opened this issue Mar 29, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

[Bug-Candidate]: Possible differences in addresses #42

glarregay-tob opened this issue Mar 29, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@glarregay-tob
Copy link
Contributor

Describe the issue:

It can happen that in the corpus a function call has the address of the echidna contract as a parameter, for example callSomething(24, 17, 0x00a329c0648769A73afAc7F9381E08FB43dBEA72).

In that case, it is possible that the address of the contract deployed in the tests will be different, leading to non-reproducible behavior due to that difference. In that case, the call should be replaced with callSomething(24, 17, address(ContractDeployedInTest))

Code example to reproduce the issue:

Private code.

Version:

N/A

Relevant log output:

No response

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant