You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was wondering if there's any reason why webots_ros is not structured the same way webots_ros2. Mainly the import of devices through the </webots> in the URDF.
Is it just because the effort is put into ROS 2, or there's any other reason I'm not seeing?
If so, would a contribution to this repository to replicate its usage be welcomed?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Yes, we are putting our effort mainly on ROS 2 and only maintain the ROS 1 interface minimally. A contribution to this repository is always welcome, as long as it doesn't implies extra work for us, except for the review.
Hi!
I was wondering if there's any reason why
webots_ros
is not structured the same waywebots_ros2
. Mainly the import of devices through the</webots>
in the URDF.Is it just because the effort is put into
ROS 2
, or there's any other reason I'm not seeing?If so, would a contribution to this repository to replicate its usage be welcomed?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: