Solar double-pole metering with a single CT #225
Replies: 3 comments 3 replies
-
You likely want to use a In this case, you'll likely want to set an id on the voltage sensors so that you can reference them from your expression. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I'm trying another approach today:
I think this approach should work for any double-pole circuits |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Here is my latest complete configuration. 15 of the 16 circuits are double pole circuits. Circuit 3 in a single pole circuit, circuit 9 is where my solar array is connected. This configuration calculates the power by creating CT sensors on each phase, instead of using multiply: 2. It then adds up the two ct sensors in a template, and reports to HA using the copy sensor. Sharing for any others that came here with a similar setup.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi,
I have a Solar system input into my electrical panel in a double pole breaker. I currently have it set up in the YAML as on phase a, and with multiply: 2 filter. However, I notice that Phase A and Phase B are not the same voltage, therefore I don't believe the calculation is accurate. I understand that if I set it up with 2 CTs, each one would be calculated on its phase, which would result in accurate measurements. However, is there a way to set up the YAML such that I can use a single CT, but measure both Leg A and Leg B power based on respective Phase A and Phase B voltage? We know that the current in both legs would be the same.
I tried this, but it resulted in 0 W for phase B power. (same input, two phase_id's
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions