You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Fast dumping (non-kernel) can be improved by utilizing the extended DLIDs with $AC. If I'm understanding correctly, $AC is used for fast dumping without the kernel running.
Typical Fast Dump (non-kernel) Procedure:
$AC (12 bytes)
$21
$AC (12 bytes)
$21
$AC (12 bytes)
$21
$AC (12 bytes)
$21
$AC (12 bytes)
$21
Total: 60 Bytes of Address Data in 10 Messages
Refined Fast Dump (non-kernel) Procedure:
$AC 81 (12 Bytes)
$AC 82 (11 Bytes)
$AC 83 (11 Bytes)
$AC 84 (11 Bytes)
$AC 85 (11 Bytes)
$AC 86 (4 or 5 Bytes)
$21
Total: 60 or 61 Bytes of Address Data in 6 Messages (not sure if 61 bytes will throw errors)
What this is doing is utilizing extended DLIDs for $AC. So instead of immediately requesting the 12 bytes, you fill up the DLIDs and then request the bulk in one command. The one problem with this is that I don't know if the TCM or ABS module supported extended DLIDs. Consult files would suggest that the TCM supports DLIDs 81->83, but I haven't personally verified this. Either way, this shouldn't matter too much, but maybe adding a failsafe to ensure it'll just revert to the old $AC, $21, $AC, $21 method if the new one is unsupported.
Fast dumping (non-kernel) can be improved by utilizing the extended DLIDs with $AC. If I'm understanding correctly, $AC is used for fast dumping without the kernel running.
Typical Fast Dump (non-kernel) Procedure:
$AC (12 bytes)
$21
$AC (12 bytes)
$21
$AC (12 bytes)
$21
$AC (12 bytes)
$21
$AC (12 bytes)
$21
Total: 60 Bytes of Address Data in 10 Messages
Refined Fast Dump (non-kernel) Procedure:
$AC 81 (12 Bytes)
$AC 82 (11 Bytes)
$AC 83 (11 Bytes)
$AC 84 (11 Bytes)
$AC 85 (11 Bytes)
$AC 86 (4 or 5 Bytes)
$21
Total: 60 or 61 Bytes of Address Data in 6 Messages (not sure if 61 bytes will throw errors)
What this is doing is utilizing extended DLIDs for $AC. So instead of immediately requesting the 12 bytes, you fill up the DLIDs and then request the bulk in one command. The one problem with this is that I don't know if the TCM or ABS module supported extended DLIDs. Consult files would suggest that the TCM supports DLIDs 81->83, but I haven't personally verified this. Either way, this shouldn't matter too much, but maybe adding a failsafe to ensure it'll just revert to the old $AC, $21, $AC, $21 method if the new one is unsupported.
Resources:
Example Showing Step by Step Process of Extended DLIDs
$AC Formatting
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: