-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Database Failover #2
Comments
Another solution could be to allow a live reload of the configuration, then we can write a tool checking the state of the application, but it needs to restart the gateway.... |
Hey @olivierACRI, Thanks for the awesome suggestions and ideas. Fail-over is the focus of the next milestone: v0.9.x. I'd be happy to discuss them further if you are interested in collaborating (contributing to the project). Just connect on LinkedIn and we can discuss it there. |
Hi @mostafa, |
Not all the tickets are implementation tickets. Some are epics for investigation (spike) and based on the investigation we will decide what to do next. Also, twelve developers, DevOps and AI/ML specialists showed interest and I already had talks with eight of them. Some of them already started working on tickets, like this one. Would be happy to connect with you as well, so we can collaborate. |
Hi,
First of all, this sounds a great project. But I think there is a lot of feature that can make it key inside an infrastructure.
For instance, the failover, as a central point of connection, it should be possible to give a list of servers that can serve as replacement if the main one is not responding. For instance a master postgres and a slave are in sync and the master crashes. This failover mechanism will allow to have an application working in degraded mode hitting the slave in read only. We can also imagine that all write requests are kept and replayed once the master is back (this is a tricky point and needs a lot of discussion, limits...)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: