You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Add the label 'high priority' if needed. Generally high priority issues affect a lot of proteins, and annotations are incorrect (as opposed to just imprecise).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm not sure. I don't think it should be located_in ribosome if it isn't a ribosomal subunit. Maybe ribosome small subunit binding?
This is pertinent to the ontology call discussion, it's a translation factor which seems to bind the ribosome and the tRNA.
It seems to assist assists in delivering tRNA to the ribosome.
From my interpretation of the definition on this page, https://wiki.geneontology.org/Located_in, 'located in' seems appropriate. Part_of would be for members of a protein-containing complex, wouldn't it? I could add ribosome binding, but I don't want to lose the CC annotation, and 'cytosol' seems too broad.
It also says
'Located in' is not used for relating gene products to a 'protein-containing complex'; those associations use 'part of
So I guess whether this is allowed comes back to the way the ribosome is classified (organelle or protein complex)
I thought we decided "complex" but currently it's organelle.
PTHR ID & PTN node:
Sequences with problematic annotation (ID + gene/protein name):
https://www.pombase.org/gene/SPBC4B4.04
is an elongation factor, not part of ribosome
problem is source annotation
https://www.yeastgenome.org/locus/S000003286
@edwong57
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: