We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Microsoft.AspNetCore.Grpc.Swagger v 0.8.11 C#
Windows 10
dotnet --info
MSVC 17.9.6 / net 8.04
Updated Microsoft.AspNetCore.Grpc.Swagger from 0.3.4 to 0.8.11
Swagger page allowing me to add repeated paths to a fieldmask. Rendering an 'Add String Value' button and a removal option:
Swagger page allowing only one path.
The option to 'Add String Value' has gone:
// The request message message EntityRequest { string EntityTypeCode = 1; string SearchCriteria = 2; bool ActiveOnly = 3; google.protobuf.FieldMask mask = 4; bool ExplicitPathing = 5; }
If I create my own FieldMask type, it all starts to work again:
message FieldMask2 { repeated string paths = 1; } ... bool ActiveOnly = 3; FieldMask2 mask = 4; bool ExplicitPathing = 5; ...
Any idea why it doesn't like the regular FieldMask?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
What version of gRPC and what language are you using?
Microsoft.AspNetCore.Grpc.Swagger v 0.8.11
C#
What operating system (Linux, Windows,...) and version?
Windows 10
What runtime / compiler are you using (e.g. .NET Core SDK version
dotnet --info
)MSVC 17.9.6 / net 8.04
What did you do?
Updated Microsoft.AspNetCore.Grpc.Swagger from 0.3.4 to 0.8.11
What did you expect to see?
Swagger page allowing me to add repeated paths to a fieldmask.
Rendering an 'Add String Value' button and a removal option:
What did you see instead?
Swagger page allowing only one path.
The option to 'Add String Value' has gone:
Example .proto:
If I create my own FieldMask type, it all starts to work again:
Any idea why it doesn't like the regular FieldMask?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: