Check out the issue tracker if you don't know yet what you want to hack on.
- match the sorroundings
- no overcomplicated pointfree style
- normal indenting 2 whitespaces
- just make things pretty and readable
- you can use the provided hsimport.hs
Everything must be documented. :) Don't assume people know what you mean. Type signatures are not sufficient documentation.
Only a GTK GUI is currently implemented, the entry point being HSFM.GUI.Gtk. From there it flows down to creating a MyGUI object in HSFM.GUI.Gtk.MyGUI, which is sort of a global object for the whole window. Inside this object are theoretically multiple MyView objects allowed which represent the actual view on the filesystem and related widgets, which are constructed in HSFM.GUI.Gtk.MyView. Both MyGUI and MyView are more or less accessible throughout the whole GTK callstack, expclicitly passed as parameters.
For adding new GTK widgets with functionality you mostly have to touch the following files:
- builder.xml: this defines the main GUI widgets which are static, use the glade editor to add stuff
- HSFM.GUI.Gtk.Data: add the widget to e.g. the MyGUI type so we can access it throughout the GTK call stack
- HSFM.GUI.Gtk.MyGUI: add initializers for the GUI buttons to be fetched from the GTK builder.xml file
- HSFM.GUI.Gtk.Callbacks: define the callbacks and the actual functionality here
Paths are usually represented in haskell libraries as type FilePath = String
.
This is bad, because of a number of reasons:
- encoding issues, since the low-level representation of filepaths is in fact an array of C chars
- weak typing... we could pass arbitrary invalid/malicious filepaths or other random strings
- no information about any property at type level (e.g. is it an absolute path?)
- no filepath constructors that do sanity checks and proper parsing
- no guarantee whether the filepath is normalised or not or even valid
Because of that, the solution is:
- use
ByteString
under the hood - wrap it inside
Path t
wheret
can be eitherAbs
(for absolute),Rel
(for relative) orFn
(for filename) - construct filepaths via smart constructors only that reject certain paths (like
.
or..
) and normalise the path
This leads to the following benefits:
- we have guarantees about whether a path is absolute or not, which is important for runtime safety in general, predictable behavior and thread safety
- we don't mess with the filepath representation we get from low-level posix functions, so encoding issues are pretty much out
- we can reason about filepaths and rely on them to be valid (don't confuse that with "they exist")
- filepath functions like
(</>)
are now predictable and safe in contrast to the version from thefilepath
package
The hpath library does exactly that for us.
The only problem with this approach is that most libraries are still String
based. Some provide dedicated Foo.ByteString
modules though, but it
might be necessary to fork libraries.
We also need to keep track of the Abstract FilePath proposal.
Almost all paths in HSFM are only allowed to be absolute (Path Abs
), unless
they are filenames (Path Fn
) and processed for GUI purposes. This is as
already mentioned for the purpose of runtime safety, predictability and
thread safety.
This is a pretty difficult problem. One thing to ensure safety on IO level
is simply the strong haskell type system, since we push everything
into our File a
type and can then pattern match easily against the different
types of files.
The only problem with this approach is that we are examining a file at point
a
in time, safe the information and then use that information further down
the call stack at point b
in time, when the file information in memory
could already be out of date. There are two approaches to make this less
sucky:
- use the hinotify library on GUI level to refresh the view (and the File representation in memory) whenever the contents of a directory changes
- when we stuff something into the copy buffer, it is not saved as type
File a
, but asPath Abs
... when the operation is finalized then the file at the given path is read and the copy/move/whatnot function carried out immediately
In addition, we don't use the directory
package, which is dangerous
and broken. Instead, we use the HPath.IO.
Exceptions are good. We don't want to wrap everything in Maybe/Either types
unless we want to handle failure immediately. Otherwise we need to make
sure that at least at some point IOExceptions are caught and visualized
to the user. This is often done via e.g. withErrorDialog
which catches
IOException
and HPathIOException.
It's also important to clean up stuff like filedescriptors via
functions like bracket
directly in our low-level code in case
something goes wrong.