Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

permissions model #35

Open
mc0e opened this issue Mar 12, 2014 · 0 comments
Open

permissions model #35

mc0e opened this issue Mar 12, 2014 · 0 comments

Comments

@mc0e
Copy link

mc0e commented Mar 12, 2014

The permissions set up by this module work fine if everything is owned and edited by the user and group of the web server process. That's typical for many shared web hosts, but I wouldn't have thought that's where puppet would be used.

On our server we have group based access for editing (requiring chmod g+w, and directories chmod g+s). we make appropriate directories group owned by www-data, and editors are also in that group. Of course other permissions modules are also likely.

Is it within the likely scope of this module to cater to alternative permissions modules, or should I be looking at forking the module?

I'm also concerned by puppet checking permissions on every run. This is a slow operation. Perhaps this should only happen on the initial installation. Besides running faster, that would also make the module more flexible for subsequently modifying the permissions scheme.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant