You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm trying to calculate the ZMP point for a humanoid, Talos, within Isaac Gym. My approach? Leveraging contact information for the task. Initially, I turned to the gym.get_env_rigid_contacts() function, and it did the job, returning all those crucial contact points within the environment. But then, when I called upon gym.get_rigid_contacts(), expecting it to work across the entire environment, I got nothing. Now, I'm faced with the less-than-ideal prospect of iterating through each environment individually to calculate those ZMP points. Not exactly the efficiency I had hoped for. I wonder if you have any idea how to solve this issue.
On another note, I could use a bit of clarity regarding the definitions of localPos0 and localPos1 returned as contact information. Initially, I assumed localPos0 would pinpoint the contact location in the frame of body0, with localPos1 following suit for body1. However, it seems that this is not the case. In my setup, with body1 taking on the role of the 'plane' (-1), I expected localPos1 to reveal the contact's whereabouts in the world frame. Alas, that isn't the case. The first value of localPos1, aligned with the x direction, always remains at 0, at least in my scenario. When I attempted to calculate the net torque applied to the robot (needed to calculate the ZMP) using localPos1, It always returned zero. localPos0, on the other hand, returned more sensible results. Can you elaborate more on the definition of these parameters a little more?
Any insights or guidance are greatly appreciated!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@amirrazmjoo Did you manage to solve the issue?
I am trying to use the same localPos0 and localPos1 api to get the contact point and calculate net torque here too. I am unsure if localPos0 and localPos1 are measured in the body frame, object frame (multiple bodies) or the world frame.
Hi,
I'm trying to calculate the ZMP point for a humanoid, Talos, within Isaac Gym. My approach? Leveraging contact information for the task. Initially, I turned to the
gym.get_env_rigid_contacts()
function, and it did the job, returning all those crucial contact points within the environment. But then, when I called upongym.get_rigid_contacts()
, expecting it to work across the entire environment, I got nothing. Now, I'm faced with the less-than-ideal prospect of iterating through each environment individually to calculate those ZMP points. Not exactly the efficiency I had hoped for. I wonder if you have any idea how to solve this issue.On another note, I could use a bit of clarity regarding the definitions of
localPos0
andlocalPos1
returned as contact information. Initially, I assumedlocalPos0
would pinpoint the contact location in the frame ofbody0
, withlocalPos1
following suit forbody1
. However, it seems that this is not the case. In my setup, withbody1
taking on the role of the 'plane' (-1), I expectedlocalPos1
to reveal the contact's whereabouts in the world frame. Alas, that isn't the case. The first value oflocalPos1
, aligned with the x direction, always remains at 0, at least in my scenario. When I attempted to calculate the net torque applied to the robot (needed to calculate the ZMP) usinglocalPos1
, It always returned zero.localPos0
, on the other hand, returned more sensible results. Can you elaborate more on the definition of these parameters a little more?Any insights or guidance are greatly appreciated!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: