Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate unstable performance-test SLAs #14793

Open
ReToCode opened this issue Jan 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Investigate unstable performance-test SLAs #14793

ReToCode opened this issue Jan 15, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness.

Comments

@ReToCode
Copy link
Member

Context

PR #14289 made performance tests work again. There has been some discussion on follow-up improvements.
PR #14429 added a new SLA to check if the expected rates match the actual rates.
Unfortunately, the performance test SLAs were never really stable in various builds, so we should look into that topic separately.

Goals

  • Adapt the performance-tests so that results are stable between multiple runs
  • Optionally update the SLA values
  • Fail the performance-test build if an SLA is breached

Previous discussions see:

Copy link

This issue is stale because it has been open for 90 days with no
activity. It will automatically close after 30 more days of
inactivity. Reopen the issue with /reopen. Mark the issue as
fresh by adding the comment /remove-lifecycle stale.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Apr 15, 2024
@ReToCode ReToCode added lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Apr 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant