SB: Service Binding for Kyma Service Instance - Epic

[pbochynski]

Description
Provide a service binding for Kyma Runtime instance. The binding should contain all the information to connect to the runtime (KUBECONFIG or all the information required to build a KUBECONFIG). The binding request can create TokenRequest and return the token in the binding.

Reasons
Users can create Kyma Runtime instances with API or BTP CLI. But the instance cannot be accessed without user being authenticated (OIDC flow). Therefore any automation flow that involves provisioning Kyma and deploying any workload there cannot be easily implemented. The only way to do that is to use custom OIDC provider, but that option is not easy to set up and use.

Attachments
Other way to achieve the automation would be kyma-project/kyma#18305

AC Added by PK

• 1. POC - ✅ donelink
• 2. Implementation on CIS side - 🏗 in progress
• 3. Implementation on Kyma side - 🏗 in progress
  • 3.1) Check with CIS what our endpoints must support (not all OSB API bindings options will be send from CIS to us) @PK85
  • 3.2) SB: Create Provisioning Service on staging and test Kyma creation and binding management #1203
  • 3.3) SB: Extend Service Bindings docs with Architecture diagram #1197
  • 3.4) SB: Implement Service Binding APIs with DB support for all OSB API operations #1198
  • 3.5) SB: Make sure Service Bindings do not block Service Instance deletion #1199
  • 3.6) SB: Define final input parameters can user send when creating Service Binding (e.g. ttl creds expiration time: 3h), and result response from the binding #1202
  • 3.7) SB: Make our swagger file up to date with Service Bindings OSB APIs #1196
  • 3.8) SB: Create e2e SKR test for all new service bindings capabilities #1204
  • 3.9) SB: KCP CLI supports short status about service bidings for given Kyma instance #1200
  • 3.10) Decide which plan is bindable (Check with PO)
  • 3.11) SB: Provide e2e tutorial in the KEB repo with Provisioning API service usage and create Kyma and credentials without user actions in the frontend #1205
• 4.0) Prepare release:
  • 4.1) RN (Iwona + PK)
  • 4.2) Help portal docs (Iwona + PK)
  • 4.3) deploy stage
  • 4.4) deploy prod

Links

1. how to make given plan bindable on given env: https://github.tools.sap/kyma/management-plane-config/blob/main/argoenv/keb/dev/values.yaml#L101, and code: https://github.com/kyma-project/kyma-environment-broker/blob/main/internal/broker/bind_create.go#L18
2. Gardener: https://github.com/gardener/gardener/blob/master/docs/usage/shoot_access.md#shootsadminkubeconfig-subresource

[kwiatekus]

the static bootstrap token created at the provisioning is extremely short living. (~5min)

[pbochynski]

As we discussed we should not use static token. I think TokenRequest api would be the best. KEB can call it directly (without provisioner / infrastructure manager in the middle) using own Kubeconfig. That would be quick and easy solution.

[PK85]

POCs:

1. create a technical user in BTP and with BTP CLI create Kyma instance and Kyma binding
2. create a technical user in BTP and create btpOperator instance and then with clientCredential create Kyma instance and Kyma binding

[danail-branekov]

FWIW, in order to address kyma-project/kyma#18092 in our project we have come up with a script that

• Uses the kyma human user kubeconfig to create an admin service account
• Generates a kubeconfig containing the service account secret

The human user has to be a cluster admin in order to be able to create the service account though.

[szwedm]

Next steps should be discussed with @pbochynski @PK85 @piotrmiskiewicz.

[kwiatekus]

@PK85, @tobiscr, @pbochynski wouldnt' this gardener's feature offer an alternative, shortcut solution?
https://github.com/gardener/gardener/blob/master/docs/usage/shoot_access.md#shootsadminkubeconfig-subresource

[PK85]

Another meeting with CIS team needed

[PK85]

We had a meeting again, and we agreed to implement MVP with Service Bindings. The MVP proposal is already to CIS team, awaiting timelines

[PK85]

MVP proposal, awaiting for CIS team: https://wiki.one.int.sap/wiki/display/kyma/Kyma+Environment+Service+Binding+-+MVP+proposal

[PK85]

Decisions after a meeting (5.08.2024) with CIS team:

• binding ID - will be generated by ERS and the user will not have to send it to the create binding API
• context - will be filled with the user id and origin (same as in create instance)
• parameters - user will provide that as part for the ERS payload and no schema validation will be done on the parameters
• bindable - ERS will validate the service and plan bindable property, if it is false, the binding request will be rejected.
• rotate - will not be supported, the user will have to delete and create a new binding.
• service and plan IDs - will be calculated by ERS (fetched form the service instance), the user will not have to send it as part of the payload.

[PK85]

Communication from CIS (11.08.2024):

A few updates from ERS side:

1. I saw that the user is sent as part of the headers in Service Instance creation, so we will align to it
   ERS is acting as a proxy - meaning - we will not save anything on our side (from bindings perspective). this leads to the following:

• a. The API user (call to ERS->createBinding) will need to pass the binding UUID (he is the one that manages the binding, and needs to know the ID)
• b. We will support async creation, but polling will be on the API user's side (since we cannot poll on our side) - the user that creates the binding (and knows the ID), will request polling on that binding, from us
• c. We will expose also API for polling last operation from the service broker

So, in terms of payload for service broker from ERS:

• binding ID - will be sent by the user, we will not generate since we can't save it on our side
• context - no need to send it, we will fill the user id and origin (same as in create instance) as part of the headers
  parameters - user will provide that as part of the ERS payload and no schema validation will be done on the parameters (see bellow)
• bindable - ERS will validate the service and plan bindable property, if it is false, the binding request will be rejected.
• rotate - will not be supported, the user will have to delete and create a new binding.
• service and plan IDs - will be calculated by ERS (fetched form the service instance), the user will not have to send it as part of the payload.
• Headers - we will add user origin and email, as an encoded string in "X-Broker-API-Originating-Identity" header (same as in service instance creation)

And my answer:

1. about user id we are getting that as a part of the context for SI operations:

    "context": {
        ...
        "user_id": "[email protected]"
    }

2. About UUID, when user creates Service Instance, the ID is generated by ERS. I think it should be still generated for user. There is as well a way to list all Environments list,

That means you should gerenate UUID, or we will generate that, see SM APIs https://api.sap.com/api/APIServiceManager/resource/ for service bindings

and then if sync mode 201 with ID and credentials in the response, or if async 202 and location header where the path serves as the relative path for the base request URI of the API: 'Get operation status'.

I think we need to meet and clarify that. Cause ERS is a platform and features like GET bindings belongs to it. Same like we have GET environments.

[PK85]

Areas:

• kcp CLI and REST API for runtime/bindings
  • define details parameters used for custom binding generation options
    • token_reqest - we have settled for just one generation method
    • expiration - SB: Define final input parameters can user send when creating Service Binding (e.g. ttl creds expiration time: 3h), and result response from the binding #1202
  • Switch between TokenRequests and shoot/adminkubeconfig - create kubeconfig @ralikio - Kyma Bindings Based on Token Requests - Create Endpoint #1151, Kyma Binding with Gardener's Adminkubeconfig  #1160, Add SKR binding test #1184 - we have settled for just one generation method
• Kubeconfig Management - create kubeconfig @ralikio - Kyma Bindings Based on Token Requests - Create Endpoint #1151, Kyma Binding with Gardener's Adminkubeconfig  #1160, Service Account, Role and Role Binding for TokenRequest Kubeconfig Binding #1180, Add SKR binding test #1184
  • limit the number of bindings per service instance up to ~10 per instance (configurable from outside) Limit bindings to max 10 #1291
  • SB is not blocking instance deletion SB: Make sure Service Bindings do not block Service Instance deletion #1199
• broker API compatibility provisioning API/OSB API requirements SB: Validate OSB Api Compliance - Test Creation #1352
  • verify that 404/410 status returned only when binding should be auto deleted
• we need implement DB table and functionlity aroud service bindings - Initial DB Table #1213 initial bindings structures provided in the PR but will evolve as requirements are refined.
• skr test for basic happy path (create binding and use returned kubeconfig) @MarekMichali Add SKR binding test #1184
• udpate swagger - SB: Make our swagger file up to date with Service Bindings OSB APIs #1196
• test with provisioning API - SB: Create e2e provisioning API test #1341

[gowrisankar22]

@pbochynski Is it a right approach, for the runtime implement a service binding to provide the kubeconfig ? Usually, service binding is for the services.

[PK85]

@gowrisankar22 Service Bindings APIs are right now under implementation for Provisioning Service by CIS team. The Kyma Environment Broker is the OSB API implementation. Why do you think Service Bindings are only for services? Cheers, PK

[pbochynski]

@pbochynski Is it a right approach, for the runtime implement a service binding to provide the kubeconfig ? Usually, service binding is for the services.

Exactly - Kyma runtime is a service and this is the long-term strategy. You can already provision Kyma from Service Marketplace in BTP cockpit.

[PK85]

Final meetings with CIS team (Zahi)

Hi, we should talk about three things.

1. Add user_id (clientid from Cloud Management Service binding) to the context in create binding request (PUT).

• Zahi: asked about checking again with full body log + headers (Ksawery please check again)

2. Set accepts_incomplete to false, because we've decided to use synchronous responses.

• Zahi: it is removed from API call completely

3. When binding expires we are removing entry form KEB database. Let's say user created 20 bindings and they all expired. In this case there will be no entries in KEB database, but get all bindings endpoint will return 20 binding with status OK. When user will try to get Credentials for one of them he will receive an error. Possible solution:
   KEB will return expires_at field in Binding Metadata during binding creation. You can save this field in the database, and return only valid bindings to user.

• Zahi: will add expiresAt in GetSingle, GetAll, create. Ksawery (Return expires_at field in Binding Metadata during binding creation #1282) needs to implement metadata:expirestAT when creating binding

[KsaweryZietara]

There are two ways of getting an access token for SAP Provisioning Service API:

• Using Password grant type

curl -L -X POST '<uaa_url>/oauth/token' \ 
-H 'Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded' \ 
-u '<clientid>:<clientsecret>' \ 
-d 'grant_type=password' \ 
-d 'username=<user email>' \
-d 'password=<password>'

During binding creation KEB receives body with context:

context: {
   "email":"user email",
   "origin":"origin"
}

Context should be saved to database as created_by = email + origin.

• Using Client Credentials grant type

curl -L -X POST '<uaa_url>/oauth/token' \ 
-H 'Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded' \ 
-u '<clientid>:<clientsecret>' \ 
-d 'grant_type=client_credentials' \ 

During binding creation KEB receives body with context:

context: {
   "origin":"clientid"
}

Context should be saved to database as created_by = origin.

[szwedm]

Meeting notes 16.10.24

1. Service Binding states are not required, we can delete objects by determining expires_at and kubeconfig fields. If expires_at is older than the current time, SB should be deleted, - SB: Binding Doc Update #1357
2. kubeconfig value determines SB state. If it's empty, SB is in an unknown state, it may be in progress (max 800ms) or error, SB: Binding Doc Update #1357
3. The first step in SB provisioning is creating a record in DB with empty kubeconfig which is populated in the last step,
4. The first step in SB deprovisioning is the cleanup of resources (ServiceAccount, ClusterRole, ClusterRoleBinding) in SKR, the last step is SB removal from DB, ✅
5. Return info about kubeconfig existence (not value!) on call to /runtimes endpoint from KCP CLI, SB: KCP CLI - Kubeconfig Existence #1358
6. During SB creation, we check wether the binding exists in DB ✅ ❓ . If kubeconfig is missing, return 500 ❓Should we really return 500 in this case ❓ , if it exists, return 200 (do nothing).
   6.1. During SB Creation first insert a record in DB, if conflict, then GET. Service Binding Insert Order #1364
7. Create a ticket for monitoring and metrics for KEB and SB cleanup job. SB: Metrics #1359

[ralikio]

10.10.2024 - Summary from the meeting about using only token requests from SA from SKR and idempotent behaviour:

Legend:
BindingID: means: BindingId - InstanceID pair on KEB side

Contract between Provisioning Service and KEB bindings:
Section moved to #1352 (comment)

KEB bindings responses details: @MarekMichali
Section moved to #1352

KEB implementation about handling binding related resources, like ServiceAccount, ClusterRole, ClusterRoleBidning

• 1) we need to have internal binding state representing ok, in_progress and error states - The state is represented by kubeconfig field - non-empty kubeconfig: binding created ok; empty kubeconfig: otherwise
• 2) probably we have two calls to db, at the begining setting in_progress state and later at the end ok or error at the beginning with an empty kubeconfig, and setting the kubeconfig when all is done/created without error Corrected Binding Insert Order #1366
• 3) to eliminate temporary issues when calling SKR to create SA, CR, CRB we need to add retries (2,3 attempts) every 1,2 seconds - [JP - it seems that during Wednesday meeting we decided otherwise]
• 4) for whole binding creation we have internal overall timeout set to 15 seconds - Timeout of creation Service Binding #1388
• 5) If we have expired bindings we do not return them when GetBinding is comming from Provisioner Service. We just keep that binding internally to be cleaned up by binding-cleanup-job later. Return 404 from GET Bindings for Expired Bindings #1355
  • if get binding is called for ID that is expired or error we return not found status code -Return 404 from GET Bindings for Expired Bindings #1355
• 6) we have limit up to 10 valid bindings (expired ones do not count)
• 7) delete Bindings enpoint deletes all sub resources, if some of them already not exist go to next one and send success code Missing Bindings' Resources Removal #1322

KEB binding-cleanup-job details
Section moved to #1347 (comment)

[kwiatekus]

@PK85
Is it planned to support creation of kyma environment bindings via

• btp cli
• sap btp terraform provider ?

It would be necessary for good devex in automation scenario

[PK85]

@kwiatekus
BTP CLI and Cockpit was removed from the scope by CIS team. Maybe in the future we can back to them asking about that.

[IwonaLanger]

Managing Kyma Runtime Using the Provisioning API of the SAP Cloud Management Service added and ready for review.