Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Default stack path may incorrectly use /opt #241

Closed
2 tasks done
TheRealGramdalf opened this issue Dec 5, 2023 · 0 comments
Closed
2 tasks done

Default stack path may incorrectly use /opt #241

TheRealGramdalf opened this issue Dec 5, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
feature-request New feature or request

Comments

@TheRealGramdalf
Copy link

⚠️ Please verify that this bug has NOT been reported before.

  • I checked and didn't find similar issue

🛡️ Security Policy

Description

By default, dockge uses /opt/stacks to store stack data, wich may go against the Linux FHS

The actual interpretation of what/opt should be used for is somewhat flexible - for example, Unraid uses /opt/appdata to store application data, which could be considered against the FHS. Since dockge is in early development, I brought it up now so that it would be on the project radar and less painful if the switch needs to be made.

Note: I consider this serious enough to be considered a bug, not a feature request - the software is behaving in an unexpected fashion.

👟 Reproduction steps

N/A

👀 Expected behavior

dockge should use the more appropriate /srv folder to store stack data

😓 Actual Behavior

dockge uses /opt to store stack data

Dockge Version

N/A

💻 Operating System and Arch

Linux/All

🌐 Browser

N/A

🐋 Docker Version

N/A

🟩 NodeJS Version

N/A

📝 Relevant log output

No response

@TheRealGramdalf TheRealGramdalf added the bug Something isn't working label Dec 5, 2023
Repository owner locked and limited conversation to collaborators Dec 5, 2023
@louislam louislam converted this issue into discussion #243 Dec 5, 2023
@louislam louislam added feature-request New feature or request and removed bug Something isn't working labels Dec 5, 2023

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
feature-request New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants