Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rec vs recording? #1348

Open
kaare-mikkelsen opened this issue Dec 5, 2024 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #1359
Open

rec vs recording? #1348

kaare-mikkelsen opened this issue Dec 5, 2024 · 2 comments · May be fixed by #1359
Milestone

Comments

@kaare-mikkelsen
Copy link
Contributor

Is there a reason why mne-bids shortens the recording field to 'rec', while all examples in the specification writes the full 'recording?

see for instance the examples in:

https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/modality-specific-files/physiological-recordings.html

I only just realized it from reading BEP 20, where a specific value for 'recording' is required.

@hoechenberger
Copy link
Member

I suppose we confused it with rec for "reconstruction"

https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/appendices/entities.html#rec

@sappelhoff
Copy link
Member

oups. Yes indeed! Thank you for the report @kaare-mikkelsen

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants