We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is there a reason why mne-bids shortens the recording field to 'rec', while all examples in the specification writes the full 'recording?
see for instance the examples in:
https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/modality-specific-files/physiological-recordings.html
I only just realized it from reading BEP 20, where a specific value for 'recording' is required.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I suppose we confused it with rec for "reconstruction"
rec
https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/latest/appendices/entities.html#rec
Sorry, something went wrong.
oups. Yes indeed! Thank you for the report @kaare-mikkelsen
FIX: don't use "rec" for recording entity. Use the full name
b2b421d
Fixes mne-tools#1348 See: https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/modality-specific-files/physiological-recordings.html
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Is there a reason why mne-bids shortens the recording field to 'rec', while all examples in the specification writes the full 'recording?
see for instance the examples in:
https://bids-specification.readthedocs.io/en/stable/modality-specific-files/physiological-recordings.html
I only just realized it from reading BEP 20, where a specific value for 'recording' is required.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: