You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In mne.stats.permutation_cluster_test there is no way of defining the minimum number of neighbouring points that defines a cluster. This is a major error in the code, which makes the code invalid. This has been discussed by many of the developers for years, but nothing has been done (see issue #10604, #10604). Most people 1) don't know why this is a problem; 2) blindly trust the function. The least you can do if you are not ready to change it is to add to the documentation that this is a shortcoming of the function and that it should not be used until it has been solved. To exclude clusters with less than n number of channels (as has been discussed in the above-linked thread) is not a valid way forward as the t-values for these clusters have already been part of the t-distribution for defining the threshold for what can be considered significant.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Proposed documentation enhancement
In mne.stats.permutation_cluster_test there is no way of defining the minimum number of neighbouring points that defines a cluster. This is a major error in the code, which makes the code invalid. This has been discussed by many of the developers for years, but nothing has been done (see issue #10604, #10604). Most people 1) don't know why this is a problem; 2) blindly trust the function. The least you can do if you are not ready to change it is to add to the documentation that this is a shortcoming of the function and that it should not be used until it has been solved. To exclude clusters with less than n number of channels (as has been discussed in the above-linked thread) is not a valid way forward as the t-values for these clusters have already been part of the t-distribution for defining the threshold for what can be considered significant.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: