Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Let there be pup init #196

Open
tmontes opened this issue Mar 2, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Let there be pup init #196

tmontes opened this issue Mar 2, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
@ api @ core enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@tmontes
Copy link
Member

tmontes commented Mar 2, 2022

IDEA:

  • Run pup init <dir> to layout a sample project, ready to be packaged.
  • Different plug-ins could help setup things for Tk, Qt, Pygame, etc.
@tmontes tmontes added this to the NEXT milestone Mar 2, 2022
@tmontes tmontes added enhancement New feature or request @ core @ api labels Mar 2, 2022
@ntoll
Copy link
Member

ntoll commented Mar 2, 2022

...and there was pup init.

And @tmontes saw that the pup was good and he separated the Qt from the Pygame.

Genesis 1:3/1:4

@tmontes
Copy link
Member Author

tmontes commented Jun 13, 2022

MORE THOUGHTS:

  • Even though this might be useful, there already are tools out there to layout a Python packagable project -- GUI or not.
  • Let's keep this in the back burner.

A DIFFERENT, more unique THOUGHT:

  • Instead of requiring a pip-installable thingie to be packaged -- which requires developers to solve the Python-level packaging issue -- could pup be clever enough to package single file Python scripts?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
@ api @ core enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants