define-unparser not provided externally

[schuster]

Judging from a quick look through the code, it looks like define-parser and define-unparser are the primary ways to parse and unparse languages. The main file provides define-parser, but not define-unparser. Any particular reason why not both?

[schuster]

Oh, hmm, apparently define-language still defines the unparser named after its defined language, but not the parser. That asymmetry is confusing.

[LeifAndersen]

I agree. @akeep Do you think it would make sense to make it consistent?

[akeep]

Yes, absolutely.  In fact, I thought it already was, though it appears the not in the Racket version.

-andy:)

On March 10, 2016 at 4:51:34 PM, Leif Andersen ([email protected]) wrote:

I agree. @akeep Do you think it would make sense to make it consistent?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.