-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Questions for the number of demand #11
Comments
It is approximate. I would expect though the number of grown cells to be the same or slightly higher, they should not be lower because of the way how the algorithm works. How much difference do you see? |
Me too. I also meet this question. After checking the simulation.c file, is this caused by the overgrow option? |
My total demand is 32961, and the simulation results range from 33198 to 34614 |
That may be fine, hard to tell without more info. Do you use the the latest version from grass addons, for example check if your r.futures.pga module has an option potential_weight (the older versions had a different option name)? Do you run it with multiple subregions or just one region? |
Hi Anna |
After I used the PGA sub-model to simulation growth of urban, I counted the number of new pathes. However, I found the new growth pathes' quantity is over or less the number in demand.csv. The pga-manuals said " PGA continues to grow patches until the per capita land demand is satisfied." Did my error operations cause this different?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: