Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Questions for the number of demand #11

Open
KaixuanDai opened this issue Jun 12, 2020 · 5 comments
Open

Questions for the number of demand #11

KaixuanDai opened this issue Jun 12, 2020 · 5 comments

Comments

@KaixuanDai
Copy link

After I used the PGA sub-model to simulation growth of urban, I counted the number of new pathes. However, I found the new growth pathes' quantity is over or less the number in demand.csv. The pga-manuals said " PGA continues to grow patches until the per capita land demand is satisfied." Did my error operations cause this different?

@petrasovaa
Copy link
Contributor

It is approximate. I would expect though the number of grown cells to be the same or slightly higher, they should not be lower because of the way how the algorithm works. How much difference do you see?

@Shens998
Copy link

Shens998 commented Jun 12, 2020

After I used the PGA sub-model to simulation growth of urban, I counted the number of new pathes. However, I found the new growth pathes' quantity is over or less the number in demand.csv. The pga-manuals said " PGA continues to grow patches until the per capita land demand is satisfied." Did my error operations cause this different?

Me too. I also meet this question. After checking the simulation.c file, is this caused by the overgrow option?
In my case, the population decreases in the latter half period, so the demand will occur a number of zero values.

@Shens998
Copy link

It is approximate. I would expect though the number of grown cells to be the same or slightly higher, they should not be lower because of the way how the algorithm works. How much difference do you see?

My total demand is 32961, and the simulation results range from 33198 to 34614

@petrasovaa
Copy link
Contributor

That may be fine, hard to tell without more info. Do you use the the latest version from grass addons, for example check if your r.futures.pga module has an option potential_weight (the older versions had a different option name)? Do you run it with multiple subregions or just one region?

@Shens998
Copy link

That may be fine, hard to tell without more info. Do you use the the latest version from grass addons, for example check if your r.futures.pga module has an option potential_weight (the older versions had a different option name)? Do you run it with multiple subregions or just one region?

Hi Anna
The grass version is 7.8.3 stable and the python version is 3.7( only possible for the FUTURES 2.0?). My study area contains 7 subregions.
BTW, thanks a lot for your huge contribution!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants