Replies: 7 comments
-
Should we change |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
@sc68cal Not sure if we are on the same page, but when I am checking API I can see that only unique property is id:
I made small correction of my initial request. If we would be able to use id not a string (name / displayname / slug) then it problem won't exist. From ansible point of view imho 2 possible scenerios:
or
hope that it's more clear now :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Yes that sounds reasonable to me. I think the second example where |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
technically possible to get in the next release or this is too optimistic? :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Are you working on it? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This works for me:
Returns:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
I believe that I've somehow missed that, but really works as we wanted in our technical assumptions. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
NetBox version
v3.4.4
Feature type
Change to existing Module
Proposed functionality
possiblity to add netbox.netbox.netbox_vm_interface using virtual_machine id (expected int) as an option besides currently used virtual_machine (expected string) parameter
Use case
In case if in Netbox 2 or more virtual machines exist with the same name in 2 or more tenants, there is no technical possibility to use netbox.netbox.netbox_vm_interface module to add interface to one of these machines, as more than 1 result will be presented.
Adding option to add via virtual_machine_id (unique value) will fix this problem.
Technically using API request we are able to filter specic interface using:
GET /api/virtualization/interfaces/?virtual_machine_id=
External dependencies
n/a
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions