Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Load images from netbox storage_backend settings #116

Open
ThomasADavis opened this issue May 23, 2022 · 4 comments
Open

Load images from netbox storage_backend settings #116

ThomasADavis opened this issue May 23, 2022 · 4 comments
Labels
status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation status: needs owner This issue is tentatively accepted pending a volunteer committed to its implementation type: feature Request for new feature or change to existing feature

Comments

@ThomasADavis
Copy link

We are running netbox in k8s using the bootc helm chart.

I'd like to use a S3 service to load images.

https://docs.netbox.dev/en/stable/configuration/optional-settings/#storage_backend

I'm currently having to update the docker container to add any images.

@dreng dreng added the type: feature Request for new feature or change to existing feature label Dec 10, 2022
@dreng
Copy link
Collaborator

dreng commented Mar 19, 2023

The link to the docs has changed: https://docs.netbox.dev/en/stable/configuration/system/#storage_backend

I have neither the experience nor the possibility to access S3 or other storage backends. I don't use docker either but maybe @mattieserver can help here.

If somebody likes to take work on it, please raise your hand.

@dreng dreng added the status: needs owner This issue is tentatively accepted pending a volunteer committed to its implementation label Mar 19, 2023
@ThomasADavis
Copy link
Author

netbox v3.5 adds some bulk loader stuff.. but need to wait and see what the actual API will be when released.

https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox/blob/feature/docs/release-notes/version-3.5.md#remote-data-sources-11558 (this link will break in the future)

@mattieserver
Copy link
Collaborator

The remote storage in v3.5 looks interesting, lets wait to see how that is implemented.

If needed i can test with S3.

@dreng dreng added the status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation label Jun 26, 2023
@dreng
Copy link
Collaborator

dreng commented Aug 20, 2024

Is this still relevant? Has anyone tested if NetBox v3.5 is sufficient?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status: accepted This issue has been accepted for implementation status: needs owner This issue is tentatively accepted pending a volunteer committed to its implementation type: feature Request for new feature or change to existing feature
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants