is nextflow mixing up channel data when run in parallel? #1954
-
Bug reportHi, Expected behavior and actual behaviorThe final merged results should come from data with the same ID, since it was the only input for the individual nextflow run. Actually it seems that nextflow mixes up data from other runs that are performed in parallel. Example: Steps to reproduce the problemJust run the script again, but the IDs that are mixed up change each time. Environment
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
It's not clear the problem you are reporting. Please include a test script to replicate it. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Dear @pditommaso , The issue can be closed, but thank you very much :) Kind regards, |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Dear @pditommaso ,
I checked my files again and found that I obviously made the mistake that I simply added input channels to a process instead of combining them.
So nextflow took the first file that finished the previous process, I assume.
The issue can be closed, but thank you very much :)
Kind regards,
Daniel